Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Medic in white coat holding digital heart

Home » National Cardiac Audit Programme » Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

The UK Transcather Aortic Valve Implantation (UK TAVI) Registry icon

The Structural Heart Intervention Registries are within the National Cardiac Audit Programme (NCAP). There are four structural heart intervention registries including Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI).

The UK TAVI program was established to capture and report outcomes on TAVI procedures performed in the UK. TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) provides a less invasive alternative to cardiac surgery and avoids the requirement for cardiopulmonary bypass.

The UK TAVI registry was created to define the characteristics and clinical outcomes of the patient population treated with TAVI, regardless of technology or access route, in every centre performing TAVI in the UK.

The project aims to capture detailed information on how TAVI is used to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis and significant comorbidities; improving the care of patients and benchmarking TAVI units to learn best practice.

The practice of collecting comprehensive clinical and outcome data by registry is a significant development in the introduction of new treatment technologies within the NHS. This process may help to shape commissioning by evaluation and encourage the safe introduction of new technologies into the NHS.

The registry is managed by NICOR with clinical direction and strategy provided by the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society (BCIS), the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgeons (SCTS).

2026 Interim Summary Report Key findings:

UK Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Registry: urgent cases represent a sicker cohort of patients to those treated electively and have worse outcomes. The UK TAVI Registry took the opportunity to perform a spotlight examination of urgent versus elective cases. This analysis shows that there are no differences in age or sex of the patients, but patients living in more deprived areas are less likely to undergo a TAVI procedure and are more likely to warrant urgent care when it is offered. Urgent cases represent a separate group to those undergoing elective treatment, being more symptomatic, with worse left ventricular function and other haemodynamic parameters.

There are no significant differences in the TAVI procedure and no significant difference in procedural complications, except for a higher requirement for renal support therapy (dialysis or haemofiltration) following the TAVI for urgent cases. In-hospital, 30-day and 1-year survival is worse for the urgent cases. It appears that outcomes for these patients won’t be improved by any specific modifications to the procedure, but there may be opportunities for optimisation of the pre-operative clinical state and secondary prevention measures following the procedure.

Clinical lead: Dr Rajesh Kharbanda

nicor.auditenquiries@nhs.net